On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > This patch just contains ip_vs_ctl > > Signed-off-by:Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > index ca8ec8c..7e99cbc 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c [ snip ] > @@ -2680,10 +2664,15 @@ static int ip_vs_genl_dump_services(struct sk_buff *skb, > int idx = 0, i; > int start = cb->args[0]; > struct ip_vs_service *svc; > - > + struct net *net = skb->sk->sk_net; skb->sk->sk_net needs CONFIG_NS_NET. Is your plan for IPVS to unconditionally depend on CONFIG_NS_NET? It would be nice to avoid that, but I fear it will be too messy. > + struct netns_ipvs *ipvs; > + if (!net) > + net = dev_net(skb->dev); > + BUG_ON(!net); > + ipvs = net->ipvs; > mutex_lock(&__ip_vs_mutex); > for (i = 0; i < IP_VS_SVC_TAB_SIZE; i++) { > - list_for_each_entry(svc, &ip_vs_svc_table[i], s_list) { > + list_for_each_entry(svc, &ipvs->ctl_svc_table[i], s_list) { > if (++idx <= start) > continue; > if (ip_vs_genl_dump_service(skb, svc, cb) < 0) { [ snip ] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html