Hello Julian, On Monday 11 October 2010 22:36:47 Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > >> There is one atomic_dec after free but I'm not sure > >> if it matches the dump below. If in doubt just add > >> svc = NULL in ip_vs_genl_set_cmd after the call to > >> ip_vs_del_service. > > > > added svc = NULL, > > but it did not make any difference :-( > > Do you see this message in debugs? Once or twice? > And with usecnt > 0?: > > IP_VS_DBG_BUF(3, "Removing service %u/%s:%u usecnt=%d\n", > > Also, do you have traffic or any connections > while removing the service? What is the result when > there is no traffic? > > >>> ex. > >>> # ipvsadm -D -f 21 -6 > >>> Slab corruption: size-512 start=ffff880001760488, len=512 > >>> Redzone: 0x9f911029d74e35b/0x9f911029d74e35b. > >>> Last user: [<ffffffffa004aa3a>](__ip_vs_del_service+0xfa/0x108 [ip_vs]) > >>> 020: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b > > Is this offset 0x24? Can you determine which > field of struct ip_vs_service is on offset 0x24? It can > be usecnt if platform is 64-bit. > I am sorry, I made a mistake I verified that the patch was in my nf-next-2.6 clone but I was running Dave Millers net-next-2.6... I will switch to nf-next-2.6 and run my tests again (with the patch included) Anyway you was right, usecnt is at offset 0x24 on my 64 bit machine. I will post the results today or to morrow. > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > -- Regards Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
