Hi simon, From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | > Hi Takeuchi-san, > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:13:24AM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote: >> >> Hi simon, >> >> From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> | >> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:35:49PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote: >> >> [Candidate 3] Completely separate IPv4 and IPv6 using >> >> "hoge6" keywords. >> >> >> >> Adding new keywords which denote IPv6. These keywords can >> >> handle IPv6 only and have a name "hoge6". >> >> >> >> fallback=fallback.example.com >> >> fallback6=fallback.example.com >> >> virtual=virtual.example.com:daytime >> >> real=real1.example.com:daytime gate >> >> real=10.10.10.10:daytime gate >> >> >> >> virtual6=virtual.example.com:daytime >> >> real6=real1.example.com:daytime gate >> >> real6=[2001:db8::10]:daytime gate >> >> fallback6=localhost:daytime >> >> >> >> This way is very similar to [Candidate 2]. But it is >> >> consistent and easy to read. A demerit is a bit redundant? >> > >> > I like candidate 3. Yes, it is redundant, but it is also very clear >> > and consistent. >> >> Yes. >> >> I have implemented [candidate 3]. Now it works good. > > Great, once you've finished your testing please post the patch. Sure! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
