[CCed netdev] Thanks, that looks correct to me. Have you tested this change? If so could you provided a Signed-off-by line as per section 12 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches? On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:19:06PM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote: > Hi，all > > After I compared the sctp with tcp and udp, I thinkt his a bug that > sctp_dnat_handler Incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out. > below is the patch. > > --- > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > index c9a3f7a..db55759 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, > return 0; > > /* Call application helper if needed */ > - if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb)) > + if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb)) > return 0; > } > > -- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
