On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On 1/4/2010 5:59, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > > [sorry for the late response, just got back from a good holiday, which > > means no work email access ;-) ] > > > >> Simon Horman wrote: > > > >>> I agree with Julian's assessment that your patch shouldn't be > >>> necessary, but on the other hand I think that the checks are > >>> reasonable. Your original patch made checks of the form of > >>> "cmd> IP_VS_SO_GET_MAX + 1". I have updated this to > >>> "cmd> IP_VS_SO_GET_MAX", as suggested by Julian, as the optmax > >>> elements of struct nf_sockopt_ops set a non-inclusive range. > >>> > >>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.0/00852.html > >>> > >>> Index: net-next-2.6/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > >> > >> As a bugfix, this seems more appropriate for net-2.6.git. Please let > >> me know which tree you want me to apply this to. > > > > this really ought to go into 2.6.33..... > > Thanks, applied and will send it upstream soon. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
