On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Catalin(ux) M. BOIE wrote:
Why do you need to change the hash size? We really don't
recommend anyone do this under normal circumstances
As it is written in the help, to lower the collisions in
the case of a lot of concurrent connections. Or am I
missing something?
not sure how big the collision problem is (have you measured
an effect?) but Ratz put out the results of a back of the
envelope calculation that the current value for the hash
table size would work on the currect fastest machines with
3G of memory
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
