From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:52:22 +1000 > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Chris Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400 > > > > > >> Julius Volz wrote: > > >> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from > > >> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a > > >> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so > > >> > there was probably no interest. > > >> > > >> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me. > > > > > > I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/ > > > is the right thing to do. > > > > Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or > > net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage > > at the moment)... > > Once net-next-2.6 is working again, let me know and I'll pull it > into lvs-next-2.6. I can't fix this if people don't tell me what the problem is. Is there some upstream fix and cures this and all I need to do is sync net-next-2.6 up with Linus's tree? Is there some external fix? It's totally stupid to stall development because of an issue like this yet give no direction or diagnostics we can use as a path to resolve it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
