On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote: > >> So maybe it would already work? ;) > > No. Some highly motivated people tried doing SNAT on OUTPUT in an attempt to > do F5-SNAT and it didn't work. This lead to the write up in > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.non-modified_realservers.html#F5_snat > > which brings us to where we are now. Thanks for the info! Right, I even said myself in the previous reply that ip_vs_postrouting() stops further processing in the POSTROUTING chain, so it never reaches netfilter NAT code. I still think an in-IPVS SNAT would be nice anyways... don't know if I'll find the time to hack on it soon, though. Julius -- Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
