On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:32:47PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm not so concerned about IPv6 local not working for now - > >> its a combination of two new features. And hopefully we > >> can iron it out in the not to distant future anyway. > > > > Yes, probably just some minor bug... > > Actually, it wasn't even a kernel bug, but a configuration error - I > was using LVS/NAT, but still had the dummy0 interface with the IPv6 > VIP configured on the real server (from the DR case). And in the local > client case, the source address is the VIP, so the real server just > delivered the response to itself. > > Now I can confirm that everything is working (without your last two > patches and with the one removing the wrong ip_route_me_harder)! Great! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
