On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Julius Volz wrote:
The other missing features are the 4 missing schedulers (DH, SH, LBLC, LBLCR) and the FTP application helper.
If it helps, the ipv4 ftp helper causes a lot of problems. People can't get it to work, because they can't follow the instructions. ftp is hard to secure and I think it should be done on a separate single machine. But if you have reasons to write an ipv6 ftp helper, don't let me stop you. I personally don't know important it is to have load balanced ftp. How does ftp.gnu.org and ftp.kernel.org handle their load? Since it's read-only, wouldn't failover handle it?
Now that I think if it. ibiblio.org, just up the street from me, runs on LVS. So maybe load balanced ftp is useful.
Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
