On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 06:15:26PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > >> Add 'supports_ipv6' flag to struct ip_vs_scheduler to indicate whether a > >> scheduler supports IPv6. Set the flag to 1 in schedulers that work with > >> IPv6, 0 otherwise. This flag is checked in a later patch while trying to > >> add a service with a specific scheduler. > > > > I wonder if there are some spare bits inside the flags > > member of ip_vs_scheduler that could be used for this purpose? > > Hm, there isn't any 'flags' member or similar in that struct... > > > Otherwise, I'm fine with this, we can juggle things around > > later to use the other bits in supports_ipv6 for other things > > if and when the need arises. > > Yes, then we could also rename it to 'flags' once needed. > > > Here is a version that applies against lvs-2.6 > > Thanks, I guess I should start basing all of my IPVS patches on this > tree rather than net-2.6? That would make things slightly more convenient for me. But I'm not the only fish in the sea :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
