On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Julius Volz wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +/* Move it to better place one day, for now keep it unique */ > >>>>> +#define NFC_IPVS_PROPERTY 0x10000 > >>> > >>> Does this have any connection to the skb flag? If so, does > >>> it really belong in the userspace interface? > >> > >> This doesn't seem to be used at all anymore, but I didn't want to > >> remove it in the same patch... should I? > > > > I'm not sure if this is (or has been) used by userspace, someone > > more familiar with IPVS should answer that. > > I don't think so. It was once used as a bitmask into skb->nfcache, > which does not even exist anymore. There's no use of it in the current > ipvsadm. I think it can go away, I'll post an updated patch again. I'm pretty sure that it is safe to get rid of NFC_IPVS_PROPERTY -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
