On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Julius Volz wrote: >> Another question I was unsure about: is the breaking of the >> userspace-to-kernel interface even acceptable at all? I think the code >> would get ugly (and have even more duplication) if you wanted to keep >> the backwards compatibility. And you have to compile ipvsadm for your >> kernel version anyways. > > Usually its not acceptable. Why do you have compile ipvsadm > for specific kernel versions? ipvsadm uses get/set-sockopts on a raw socket to pass commands and structs (as defined in include/net/ip_vs.h) to the kernel. So the passed structs have to match exactly between userspace and kernel. The kernel ip_vs.h also includes a version number that is used to verify that ipvsadm matches your kernel version. Julius -- Google Switzerland GmbH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html