On Friday 09 May 2008 21:49:52 Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Julius Volz wrote: > > > Hm, ok. This patch doesn't touch any functionality though. It only > > moves files from one directory to another, so it's merely cosmetics, > > no IPv6 knowledge required. > > are you at a stage where it's all split up, after which > you'll only be working on the ipv6 part and leaving the ipv4 > untouched? Have you tested the ipv4 part to make sure it's > still OK. ie the code is reorthogonalised but with no change > in functionality? I haven't applied the patch and done a diff to individual files to be certain, but I'm pretty sure that the patch is mainly just a directory change. IPVS itself is already fairly well abstracted protocol-wise. Just another guess, but it sounds like Julius is submitting the patch as it would make more meaty patches smaller. > If so then this might be a good point to submit to the > kernel. Also Jason might be interested in the new version of > the code (hopefully working in different parts of the code, > you two won't be having many collisions). Call me crazy, but I plan to put my patch into production in two weeks time without the connect-to-vip-from-director parts. If everything goes well, I'll post patches again with adequate comments (and adjustments to comments). And to make this relevant: My patches don't do anything protocol specific other than to change when things are done and so would be fairly easy to update for IPV6 if/when it is integrated. -- Jason Stubbs <j.stubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> LINKTHINK INC. 東京都渋谷区桜ヶ丘町22-14 N.E.S S棟 3F TEL 03-5728-4772 FAX 03-5728-4773 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
