On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I'm not cc:ing you any more. There's no need to cc me, I
read everything from lvs. I cc people when I think they may
not be paying attention, Horms because he's busy, Julian
because most traffic doesn't concern his patches.
netfilter sees the source and dest on the packets. How can
netfilter only see the VIP?
Current LVS-NAT goes something like:
PREROUTING client => VIP
LOCAL_IN client => VIP
LVS in hook
LOCAL_OUT client => RIP
POSTROUTING client => RIP
yup
With my patch it goes like:
PREROUTING client => VIP
FORWARD client => VIP
POSTROUTING client => VIP
LVS hook
POSTROUTING client => RIP
LVS-DR is pretty much the same flow except that the
packet's MAC destination is changed instead. What I mean
with netfilter only seeing the VIP is that I'd like the
second POSTROUTING run that happens with my patch to not
happen. Doing so makes rule writing on the director a
little easier as the rules don't need to know about the
RIPs at all.
hmm, maybe I see.
Let me see if I've got it.
1.
Because the packet is controlled by LVS-NAT, it should be
accepted as OK and will never have to be inspected for
bogosity (you will have done that already, if you'd needed
it). ie you aren't going to be filtering on RIPs.
The configuration I'm planning to use is a LVS-NAT
director/firewall that allows external traffic to VIPs,
SNATs traffic from RIPs to external (including to VIPs)
and drops everything else.
2.
your particular setup does this, and reasonably other
LVS-NAT setups will be doing much the same.
With LVS-DR, I am pretty sure that all the issues
mentioned in the page you linked to still apply as my
patch only changes the flow through the director. The
rules mentioned in the following link would be needed
whether the SERVER_GW is separate device to the director
or not.
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.non-lvs_clients_on_realservers.html#3-tier_routes
OK
You'd better run it by Horms. I'm happy to talk about this
while he's busy, but he knows the code better than I do and
will be able to cast a more critical eye
Hey Horms,
Can you give Jason's scheme the once over?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html