On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:25:20AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, pierrick grasland wrote: > >> But how do you work with persistence ? (actually, with -p options). >> >> Each call during the interval go to the same server, and then, do you reset >> the timer for each new call) or no ? > > I'd defer to Horms on this if he thinks otherwise but... I wouldn't do it > that way. There's all sorts of problems with using a timer in the lvs > (-p) persistence to detect a returning client and I'm trying to convince > people to move to the -SH scheduler instead. > > The -SH scheduler addresses the same problem, but by scheduling on the > CIP. As long as the client doesn't change IPs within their session, then > you're OK (this is valid except for people using pathologically > configured proxy setups). > > I don't know if you can us the CIP to uniquely identify a client in SIP. > If not, you'll have to do it on call-id. I think that in the case that I was looking at this would not have worked well as all the traffic came from the same IP address or a handful of IP addresses - think in terms of handling requests from a proxy server. However, -SH might be a good approach for many cases. -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html