On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:43:35AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Simon Horman wrote: > >> [ Joe, I'm not sure that the LOCAL_IN stuff is really related >> specifically to IPv6. But you do remind me that those patches >> need to be revisited. ] > > Agree, but we don't want Julius writing code for LOCAL_IN at the same > time we're moving the hook elsewhere. IIRC the current change that is being talked about is to allow switching from one hook to another. I think it will be a long while before LOCAL_IN is removed because I think there will be a lot of subtle differences between LVS-LOCAL_IN and LVS-FORWRD. The kind of differences that will break things for some people. So I think LOCAL_IN will have to remain as an option even if FORWARD ends up working well for most people most of the time. -- Horms -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
