On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:22:38PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 31. 07. 19 v 11:39 Julian Andres Klode napsal(a): > > > > I don't see how this has anything to do with lvmetad. There is no lvmetad > > > > anymore. > > > > > > The whole point of 'service' for 'pvscan' is to postone activation of DM > > > devices outside of udev rule processing. > > > > > > So whatever is replacing systemd service in your's systemd-less system must > > > provide similar functionality. > > > > > > There is currently no way to accept autoactivation capability within > > > udev-rule processing. > > > > This has nothing to do with the part of the message you are replying too, and > > is nonsense. The code to run pvscan directly is shipped, the change just moves > > the decision whether to do that from compile-time to run-time. > > As long as 'pvscan' is executed with 'auto-activation' option - it can't be > run from udev rule. Any proposal for this needs to first resolve, > how to ensure udev will not try to kill running command in the middle of work. > > Until this is resolved - proposal of this can't be accepted upstream. Again: The code is already there. I'm just moving the decision what to pick from compile-time to run-time. This is entirely orthogonal to whether the existing code works well or not. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
