Hello David, Sorry for delayed reply. the verbose log (lvm2-2.02.180) looks like, #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/disk/by-id/ata-TSSTcorp_DVDWBD_SH-B123L_R84A6GDC10003F - new alias. #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/disk/by-label/SLE-12-SP4-Server-DVD-x86_640456 - new alias. #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:1f.2-ata-2 - new alias. #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/disk/by-uuid/2018-11-07-14-08-50-00 - new alias. #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/dvd - new alias. #device/dev-cache.c:763 Found dev 11:0 /dev/dvdrw - new alias. #cache/lvmetad.c:1420 Asking lvmetad for complete list of known PVs #device/dev-io.c:609 Opened /dev/sda RO O_DIRECT #device/dev-io.c:359 /dev/sda: size is 268435456 sectors #device/dev-io.c:658 Closed /dev/sda #filters/filter-partitioned.c:37 /dev/sda: Skipping: Partition table signature found #filters/filter-type.c:27 /dev/cdrom: Skipping: Unrecognised LVM device type 11 #device/dev-io.c:609 Opened /dev/sda1 RO O_DIRECT #device/dev-io.c:359 /dev/sda1: size is 4206592 sectors #device/dev-io.c:658 Closed /dev/sda1 #filters/filter-mpath.c:196 /dev/sda1: Device is a partition, using primary device sda for mpath component detection #device/dev-io.c:336 /dev/sda1: using cached size 4206592 sectors #filters/filter-persistent.c:346 filter caching good /dev/sda1 #device/dev-io.c:609 Opened /dev/root RO O_DIRECT #device/dev-io.c:359 /dev/root: size is 264226816 sectors #device/dev-io.c:658 Closed /dev/root #filters/filter-mpath.c:196 /dev/root: Device is a partition, using primary device sda for mpath component detection #device/dev-io.c:336 /dev/root: using cached size 264226816 sectors #filters/filter-persistent.c:346 filter caching good /dev/root #device/dev-io.c:567 /dev/sdb: open failed: No medium found <<== here #device/dev-io.c:343 <backtrace> #filters/filter-usable.c:32 /dev/sdb: Skipping: dev_get_size failed #toollib.c:4377 Processing PVs in VG #orphans_lvm2 #locking/locking.c:331 Dropping cache for #orphans. #misc/lvm-flock.c:202 Locking /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans RB #misc/lvm-flock.c:100 _do_flock /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans:aux WB #misc/lvm-flock.c:47 _undo_flock /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans:aux #misc/lvm-flock.c:100 _do_flock /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans RB #cache/lvmcache.c:751 lvmcache has no info for vgname "#orphans". #metadata/metadata.c:3764 Reading VG #orphans_lvm2 #locking/locking.c:331 Dropping cache for #orphans. #misc/lvm-flock.c:70 Unlocking /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans #misc/lvm-flock.c:47 _undo_flock /run/lvm/lock/P_orphans #cache/lvmcache.c:751 lvmcache has no info for vgname "#orphans". #locking/locking.c:331 Dropping cache for #orphans. Thanks Gang >>> On 4/24/2019 at 11:08 pm, in message <20190424150858.GA3218@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:23:29PM -0600, Gang He wrote: >> Hello Peter and David, >> >> Thank for your quick responses. >> How do we handle this behavior further? >> Fix it as an issue, filter this kind of disk silently. >> or keep the current error message printing, looking a bit unfriendly, but > the logic is not wrong. > > Hi, > > I'd like to figure out what the old code was doing differently to avoid > this. Part of the problem is that I don't have a device that reports > these same errors. Could you send me the output of pvscan -vvvv so I can > see which open is causing the error? > Thanks _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
