On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 04:23:27AM -0600, Gang He wrote: > Hello List > > The system uses lvm based on raid1. > It seems that the PV of the raid1 is found also on the single disks that build the raid1 device: > [ 147.121725] linux-472a dracut-initqueue[391]: WARNING: PV qG1QRz-Ivm1-QVwq-uaHV-va9w-wwXh-lIIOhV on /dev/sda2 was already found on /dev/md1. > [ 147.123427] linux-472a dracut-initqueue[391]: WARNING: PV qG1QRz-Ivm1-QVwq-uaHV-va9w-wwXh-lIIOhV on /dev/sdb2 was already found on /dev/md1. > [ 147.369863] linux-472a dracut-initqueue[391]: WARNING: PV qG1QRz-Ivm1-QVwq-uaHV-va9w-wwXh-lIIOhV prefers device /dev/md1 because device size is correct. > [ 147.370597] linux-472a dracut-initqueue[391]: WARNING: PV qG1QRz-Ivm1-QVwq-uaHV-va9w-wwXh-lIIOhV prefers device /dev/md1 because device size is correct. > [ 147.371698] linux-472a dracut-initqueue[391]: Cannot activate LVs in VG vghome while PVs appear on duplicate devices. Do these warnings only appear from "dracut-initqueue"? Can you run and send 'vgs -vvvv' from the command line? If they don't appear from the command line, then is "dracut-initqueue" using a different lvm.conf? lvm.conf settings can effect this (filter, md_component_detection, external_device_info_source). > This is a regression bug? since the user did not encounter this problem with lvm2 v2.02.177. It could be, since the new scanning changed how md detection works. The md superblock version effects how lvm detects this. md superblock 1.0 (at the end of the device) is not detected as easily as newer md versions (1.1, 1.2) where the superblock is at the beginning. Do you know which this is? _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
