Re: lvmlockd: about the limitation on lvresizing the LV active on multiple nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> > I've tested your patch and it works very well.  Thanks very much.
> 
> Could you please consider to push this patch upstream?

OK

> Also, Is this the same case for pvmove as lvresize? If so, can we also
> work out a similar patch for pvmove?

Running pvmove on an LV active on multiple hosts could be allowed with the
same kind of patch.  However, it would need to use cmirror which we are
trying to phase out; the recent cluster raid1 has a more promising future.
So I think cmirror should be left in the clvm era and not brought forward.

Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux