Re: Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zdenek Kabelac schreef op 22-04-2017 23:17:

That is awesome, that means a errors=remount-ro mount will cause a remount right?

Well 'remount-ro' will fail but you will not be able to read anything
from volume as well.

Well that is still preferable to anything else.

It is preferable to a system crash, I mean.

So if there is no other last rather, I think this is really the only last resort that exists?

Or maybe one of the other things Gionatan suggested.

Currently lvm2 can't support that much variety and complexity...

I think it's simpler but okay, sure...

I think pretty much anyone would prefer a volume-read-errors system rather than a kernel-hang system.

It is just not of the same magnitude of disaster :p.

The explanation here is simple - when you create a new thinLV - there
is currently full suspend - and before 'suspend' pool is 'unmonitored'
after resume again monitored - and you get your warning logged again.

Right, yes, that's what syslog says.

It does make it a bit annoying to be watching for messages but I guess it means filtering for the monitoring messages too.

If you want to filter out the recurring message, or check current thin pool usage before you send anything.

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux