Hi Peter, as i said, we have master/slave setup _without_ concurrent write/read. So i do not see a reason why i should take care of locking as only one node is activating the volume group at the same time. That should be fine - right? Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von:Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> > > If you are working with 'shared' storage and manipulating same VG from > multiple nodes (i.e. activation) - it's not so easy to go without really good > locking manager. > > If you don't like clvmd - maybe you could take a look at lvmlockd & sanlock. > > But you should be aware there are NOT many people who are able to ensure > correct locking of lvm2 commands - it's really not just 'master/slave'. > There are big number of error cases which do not proper locking around > the whole cluster. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
