whatever you might call it, it works, luks encrypting,
opening & mounting @boot - so I only wonder (which was my
question) why not cache pool LVs. Is it not supported...
would be great if a developer sees this question, I'm not
sure jut yet about filing a bug report.
On 26/08/16 14:28, Xen wrote:
lejeczek schreef op 26-08-2016 14:45:
well, I prefer to encrypt LV itself, and I'm trying the
same what
worked always with my "regular" LVs, yet - "cache pools
LVs" fail to
encrypt with: Command failed with code 22.
If you are going to encrypt an LV it will no longer be an
LV but an (opened) LUKS container.
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
