Re: about the lying nature of thin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/29/2016 03:44 AM, Marek Podmaka wrote:

Now I'm not sure what your use-case for thin pools is.

I don't see it much useful if the presented space is smaller than
available physical space. In that case I can just use plain LVM with
PV/VG/LV. For snaphosts you don't care much as if the snapshot
overfills, it just becomes invalid, but won't influence the original
LV.

One useful case for "presented space equal to physical space" with thin volumes is that it simplifies security issues.

With raw LVM volumes I generally need to zero out the whole volume prior to deleting it (to avoid leaking the contents to other users). This takes time, and also seriously hammers the disks when you have multiple volumes being zeroed in parallel.

With thin, deletion is essentially instantaneous, and the zeroing penalty is paid when the disk block is actually written. Any disk blocks which have not been written are simply read as all-zeros.

Chris

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux