Re: Testing ThinLVM metadata exhaustion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 18-04-2016 16:25 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
Hi all,
I'm testing the various metadata exhaustion cases and how to cope with
them. Specifically, I would like to fully understand what to expect
after a metadata space exhaustion and the relative check/repair. To
such extents, metadata autoresize is disabled.

I'm using a fully updated CentOS 6.7 x84_64 virtual machine, with a
virtual disk (vdb) dedicated to the thin pool / volumes. This is what
pvs reports:

PV         VG          Fmt  Attr PSize  PFree
/dev/vda2  vg_hvmaster lvm2 a--  63.51g    0
/dev/vdb   vgtest      lvm2 a--  32.00g    0

I did the following operations:
vgcreate vgtest /dev/vdb
lvcreate --thin vgtest/ThinPool -L 1G 	# 4MB tmeta
lvchange -Zn vgtest
lvcreate --thin vgtest/ThinPool --name ThinVol -V 32G
lvresize vgtest/ThinPool -l +100%FREE # 31.99GB, 4MB tmeta, not resized

With 64 KB chunks, the 4 MB tmeta volume is good for mapping ~8 GB, so
any other writes trigger a metadata space exhaustion. Then, I did:

a) a first 8 GB write to almost fill the entire metadata space:
[root@hvmaster ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vgtest/ThinVol bs=1M count=8192
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 101.059 s, 85.0 MB/s
[root@hvmaster ~]# lvs -a
  LV               VG          Attr       LSize  Pool     Origin Data%
 Meta%  Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
  lv_root          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao---- 59.57g

  lv_swap          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao----  3.94g

ThinPool vgtest twi-aot-M- 31.99g 21.51 92.09
  [ThinPool_tdata] vgtest      Twi-ao---- 31.99g

  [ThinPool_tmeta] vgtest      ewi-ao----  4.00m

  ThinVol          vgtest      Vwi-a-t--- 32.00g ThinPool        23.26

  [lvol0_pmspare]  vgtest      ewi-------  4.00m
[root@hvmaster ~]# thin_dump /dev/mapper/vgtest-ThinPool_tmeta
<superblock uuid="" time="0" transaction="1" data_block_size="128"
nr_data_blocks="524096">
  <device dev_id="1" mapped_blocks="121968" transaction="0"
creation_time="0" snap_time="0">
<range_mapping origin_begin="0" data_begin="0" length="121968" time="0"/>
  </device>
</superblock>

b) a second non-synched 16 GB write to totally trash the tmeta volume:
# Second write
[root@hvmaster ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vgtest/ThinVol bs=1M count=8192
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 101.059 s, 85.0 MB/s
[root@hvmaster ~]# lvs -a
  LV               VG          Attr       LSize  Pool     Origin Data%
 Meta%  Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
  lv_root          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao---- 59.57g

  lv_swap          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao----  3.94g

ThinPool vgtest twi-aot-M- 31.99g 21.51 92.09
  [ThinPool_tdata] vgtest      Twi-ao---- 31.99g

  [ThinPool_tmeta] vgtest      ewi-ao----  4.00m

  ThinVol          vgtest      Vwi-a-t--- 32.00g ThinPool        23.26

  [lvol0_pmspare]  vgtest      ewi-------  4.00m
[root@hvmaster ~]# thin_dump /dev/mapper/vgtest-ThinPool_tmeta
<superblock uuid="" time="0" transaction="1" data_block_size="128"
nr_data_blocks="524096">
  <device dev_id="1" mapped_blocks="121968" transaction="0"
creation_time="0" snap_time="0">
<range_mapping origin_begin="0" data_begin="0" length="121968" time="0"/>
  </device>
</superblock>

c) a third, synched 16 GB write to see how the system behave with
fsync-rich filling:
[root@hvmaster ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vgtest/ThinVol bs=1M
count=16384 oflag=sync
dd: writing `/dev/vgtest/ThinVol': Input/output error
7624+0 records in
7623+0 records out
7993294848 bytes (8.0 GB) copied, 215.808 s, 37.0 MB/s
[root@hvmaster ~]# lvs -a
  Failed to parse thin params: Error.
  Failed to parse thin params: Error.
  Failed to parse thin params: Error.
  Failed to parse thin params: Error.
  LV               VG          Attr       LSize  Pool     Origin Data%
 Meta%  Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
  lv_root          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao---- 59.57g

  lv_swap          vg_hvmaster -wi-ao----  3.94g

ThinPool vgtest twi-aot-M- 31.99g 21.51 92.09
  [ThinPool_tdata] vgtest      Twi-ao---- 31.99g

  [ThinPool_tmeta] vgtest      ewi-ao----  4.00m

  ThinVol          vgtest      Vwi-a-t--- 32.00g ThinPool

  [lvol0_pmspare]  vgtest      ewi-------  4.00m
[root@hvmaster ~]# thin_dump /dev/mapper/vgtest-ThinPool_tmeta
<superblock uuid="" time="0" transaction="1" data_block_size="128"
nr_data_blocks="524096">
metadata contains errors (run thin_check for details).
perhaps you wanted to run with --repair

It is the last scenario (c) that puzzle me: rebooting the machine left
the thinpool inactive and inactivable (as expected), but executing
lvconvert --repair I can see that _all_ metadatas are gone (the pool
seems empty). Is that the expected behavior?

Even more puzzling (for me) is that by skipping test a and b, and
going directly for c, I have a different behavior: the metadata volume
is (rightfully) completely filled, and the thin pool went in read-only
mode. Again, it that the expected behavior?

Regards.

Hi all,
doing more tests I noticed that when "catastrophic" (non recoverable) metadata loss happens, dmesg logs the following lines:

device-mapper: block manager: validator mismatch (old=sm_bitmap vs new=btree_node) for block 429 device-mapper: space map common: unable to decrement a reference count below 0 device-mapper: thin: 253:4: metadata operation 'dm_thin_insert_block' failed: error = -22

During "normal" metadata exhaustion (when the pool can recover), the first two lines are not logged at all. Moreover, the third line reports error = -28, rather than error = -22 as above.

I also tested the latest RHEL 7.2 and I can not reproduce the error above: metadata exhaustion always seems to be managed in a graceful (ie: recoverable) manner.

I am missing something?
Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux