Hi,
I found that the <low_water_mark> parameter of thin-pool's table might be wrong. In kernel, the this parameter is the number of free blocks. However, LVM commit 99237f0908d87592815f4bdf3c239e8a108e835c sets this value as the number of USED blocks, according to activation_thin_pool_autoextend_threshold_CFG. Is that a bug?
I found that the <low_water_mark> parameter of thin-pool's table might be wrong. In kernel, the this parameter is the number of free blocks. However, LVM commit 99237f0908d87592815f4bdf3c239e8a108e835c sets this value as the number of USED blocks, according to activation_thin_pool_autoextend_threshold_CFG. Is that a bug?
Thanks,
Ming-Hung Tsai
_______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
