Re: Possible bug in expanding thinpool: lvextend doens't expand the top-level dm-linear device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-12-26 2:37 GMT+08:00 Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>:
> Dne 25.12.2015 v 03:27 M.H. Tsai napsal(a):
>
> It's not so simple - since the user may activate  thin-pool without
> activation of any thin-volume, and keep thin-pool active while thin-volumes
> are activated and deactivated - so it's different case if user activates
> thin-pool explicitly or thin-pool is activated as thin volume dependency.
>
> Also thin-pool LV has its own cluster lock which is quite complicated to
> explain, but for now -  thin-pool size is unimportant, but it's existence is
> mandatory :)

I

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux