Re: Extend VG - Expand LUN vs New Disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21/2015 08:50 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Expanding an existing LUN may involve resizing partitions - that is
> normally the step that makes this the more complicated route since
> depending on system configuration and use it may not be easy to resize
> the partition without downtime (the Linux kernel has for some time
> enforced restrictions on resizing in-use partitions - device-mapper
> devices and whole disk devices do not share this limitation).

We use whole disks all the time :)

> It's safe enough - it's just that the kernel generally won't let you
> do it while the existing partition is active and in use.

I'm glad to know that:  one more reason to use whole disks.  I know Red
Hat favors partitions for PVs (as mentioned in various docs) but I've
never been convinced by the arguments for it.


> Expanding an existing partition may be seen as the "cleaner" option,
> since it avoids creating additional PVs and associated labels and
> metadata areas, but unless you are working with very large numbers of
> devices it makes little difference to most operations.

Excellent point.

> Gluing lots of devices together is one of the main reasons for using a
> volume manager and for typical uses it adds no appreciable overhead
> or additional complexity.

Thanks Bryn for your wonderful feedback.  I appreciate it!

All the best,
Jorge

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux