Libor> web have 4x3TB disks in LVM for backups and I setup per Libor> customer/per "task" LV type raid5 on it. Can you post the configuration details please, since they do matter. It would seem to me, that it would be better to use 'md' to create the underlying RAID5 device, and then use LVM on top of that /dev/md0 to create the customer LV(s) as needed. Libor> Last week, smartd started to alarm us, that one of the disk Libor> will soon go away. Libor> So we shut down the computer, replaced disk and then i used Libor> vgcfgrestore on new disk to restore metadata. You should have shutdown the system, added in a new disk, and then rebooted the system. At that point you would add the new disk into the RAID5, and then fail the dying disk. It would be transparent to the LVM setup and be much safer. I'd also strongly advise you to get RAID6 setup and have a hot spare also setup, so that you don't have this type of issue in the future. Libor> Result was, that some LVs came up with damaged filesystem, some Libor> didn't came up at all with messages like (one of rimage and Libor> rmeta was "wrong", when i used KVPM util, it was type "virtual" This sounds very much like you just lost a bunch of data, which RAID5 shouldn't do. So please post the details of your setup, starting at the disk level and moving up the stack to the filesystem(s) you have mounted for backups. We don't need the customer names, etc, just the details of the system. Also, which version of lvm, md, linux kernel, etc are you using? The more details the better. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
