> From: Mike Snitzer > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:02 AM > > So if I were relegated to using upstream kernels, I'd track latest > stable kernel if I could. I can, and I guess I will :), it just adds a little extra volatility and work. Maybe by the time the next long-term stable after 3.12 gets picked thin provisioning and cache will have settled down enough to go with it. > I'm not sure if the tool tracks the rate of change. It may account for > worst case of _every_ block for the provided number of thin devices > _not_ being shared. Interesting, then after I added an extra order of magnitude padding for the number of snapshots, it's probably quite over allocated. But still, again 2.5G isn't very much in the scale of things. Thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
