Re: LV mirror extents on same physical device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This indicates that it "worked" that way on some versions rhel5 but
does not work that way on rhel6 in a number of versions.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594525

I would suspect depending on exactly what version you are using that
it is a bug.

I know up to at least 5.7 there are some bad LVM bugs when you are
doing abnormal things (mirroring, pvmoves with lv with multiple
extents), there are probably other bugs I don't know about.

I would suggest unmirroring it, and just doing a straight pvmove to
the new device, mirroring it in the middle would just appear to
complicate things.


On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Julie Ashworth <ashworth@berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
> On 23-02-2014 20.16 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
>> If I am reading what I can find correctly - -alloc=anywhere defeats
>> the mirror code from attempting to put on 2 different physical
>> devices.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> -alloc=anywhere just refers to the logs, which isn't important at this point.
> best,
> Julie
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux