Thanks ^^
I meant though that I'd like to follow the upstream bug report with gcc
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2013 02:33 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:So finally we get to the source of the problem.
> If and when you guys post a bug report with gcc, could you post a copy
> of it here?
>
> I plan to follow the bug myself
It's reported here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995446
The workaround we provide is to not use the "static"
qualifier for the string that is malformed by that bug
(and hence the optimizer is not touching it that much):
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/lvm2.git/commit/?id=2f61478436a7ebe058ffad3f92e1c4dada0805d0
I'll update F19 shortly.
Peter
_______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
