Dne 21.3.2013 19:31, Vladislav Bogdanov napsal(a):
20.03.2013 11:45, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
...
(BTW there is already one thing which will surely not pass - it's the
'node' option for lvm command - this would have to be made diferently).
clvmd uses term 'node' internally. And that is the most right term for
what it means IMHO.
Yes - in clvmd locking layer it's ok - but lvm namespace stays aways from
this layer. Thus lvm is not aware of any locking mechanism.. So the thing
would have to be handle via activation lock flags and as I've said - the
protocol used there (lvm <-> clvmd) is quite fragile.
Zdenek
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
