On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:44:58PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > >> I'm trying to figure out why the code doesn't already use CONVERT when > >> possible; I would have expected it to. > > > >> What happens now without this force/CONVERT > >> patch? a new lock created/requested? > >> > After new lock creation is requested ;) Yeah, it doesn't make much sense for clvmd-corosync.c to do that. I'm hoping that we can make clvmd-corosync.c aware that it already holds that lock and attempt to convert it. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
