Re: lvreduce nightmare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tariq,

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:29:56PM +0530, tariq wali wrote:
> I am not sure if reducing by lvreduce alone is safe and will actually
> reduce the underneath file system also,

It won't; I never said it would.

My point was that you said:

> and then lvreduce -n data -L 100G /dev/vg0/data ( to reduce the lvm by
> 100

but that WON'T do what you want. That will reduce the LV *to* 100G.

You need BOTH your resize2fs AND lvreduce commands to be correct.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux