Re: advice for curing terrible snapshot performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Stephane Chazelas wrote:

> ddsnap (zumastor) worked great but is no longer maintained.
> 
> - LVM snapshots: poor performace or very few snapshots
> - ddsnap: got to stick with an old kernel

zumastor doesn't depend on kernel versions - it uses device-mapper just
like regular snapshots.  (Or does it have a special device-mapper
kernel module?)

> - btrfs, not really production ready yet. Probably your best bet
> though.

This is good too, but at a different level.  We still need LV snapshot.

> - fuse solutions, with all the fuse related issues.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux