Re: Questions regarding LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vishal Verma -X (vishaver - Embedded Resource Group at Cisco) [vishaver@cisco.com] wrote:
>    1.       Under scenario where, several hard-drives are part of LVM volume
>    group and if one of hard-disk gets corrupted then would whole volume group
>    be inaccessible ?

No.

>    What would be impact on volume group's filesystem ?

A volume group may have several file system images. You should have no
problem in accessing logical volumes (or file systems on them) that
don't include the corrupted/failed disk. Obviously, logical volumes that
include the corrupted/failed disk will have problems unless it is
a mirrored logical volume!

>    2.       From stability perspective, which version of LVM is better on
>    Linux kernel 2.6.x, LVM2 or LVM1 ?

I would go with LVM2.

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux