I don't know about a whitepaper, but I can address
your example.
he makes one volume group for each logical volume (more or less)
If each one has one volume, that's not exactly a volume
GROUP, is it? If groups and volumes are basically synomous,
he gives up all the benfits of groups. In fact, he gives
up most of the benefits of logical volumes, since each PV
has to be in one group, and each VG is one LV, you're left
with one LV per PV - might as well just use partitions
directly.
--
Ray Morris
support@bettercgi.com
On 10/29/2009 06:45:39 PM, Abraham Pérez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for some whitepapper or similar document to find any kind
of
best practices using LVM.
For example, usually i make only one volume group in each server and
inside
it I create different logical volumes for different purposes, but
talking
with one colleague, we discover that he makes one volume group for
each
logical volume (more or less)... so my final question is: in
performance
terms, what configuration is more efficient and why?
Please excuse my writen english, but I don't use it very often.
Thanks for your attention,
Abraham Pérez
------quoted attachment------
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
