On 2009-07-21 05:35, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:41:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Debian Sid's 2.02.44-3 returns a non-zero code, so either RH fixed it
upstream, or Debian patched it...
# vgs /dev/sdc1
WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config node: filter (seeking filter)
Volume group "sdc1" not found
# echo $?
5
That's a *different* error case that works correctly.
Yes, I agree that the original case mentioned should give EINVALID_CMD_LINE
instead of ECMD_PROCESSED.
> On 2009-07-21 02:16, Masanari Iida wrote:
> # vgs /dev/cciss/c0d3p3
> Invalid volume group name: cciss/c0d3p3
Hey, you're right!!
But why? (I tried to mimic his example as best I could.)
Is it because of the multi-level device name, and the parser getting
confused?
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
