Re: fsync() and LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Let's try to clear up the confusion.

Kernel device-mapper (which lvm uses) does not support write barriers
except in very restricted circumstances (when only one device is
involved and the mapping is trivial).  If dm receives a write barrier
which is not supported it notifies the caller (typically a filesystem)
so appropriate action can be taken if it wishes.

Several kernels releases ago, the implementation of the 'flush device'
operation in the block layer was changed from a simple function call
that dm supported to a mechanism involving barriers that is trickier for
dm to support.  Previously 'flush' could not fail and so callers do not
generally have strategies to handle such a situation.

The latest of several attempts to support barriers is contained in
patches here:
  http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/list/?q=barriers

Please review and test if you are interested!

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux