Re: Re: About fstab and fsck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/2/13  <f-lvm@media.mit.edu>:
> For that matter, subtle hardware issues might eat the data in your
> files, bit by bit, and you might never notice unless it was starting
> to eat your metadata and you wondered why fsck kept finding small
> errors.  It depends on whether you care whether your data might have
> a few bits of corruption scattered through it.

Which is why ZFS was invented, and we are hoping for btrfs. You need
checksums when you use pc-level rotating rust for storing data.

Best
   Martin

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux