Hello. On 2009-02-09; 23:09:00, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:30 +0100, hondza wrote: > > I liked the idea very much so I made a simple C tool to do so. Thanks to > > Lars for describing how it works. > > But how/why is it any different than the above project? As to how: dm-merge is standalone, doesn't rely on any patches, and is more of a hack. The CachedClient patches seem to be more robust. As to why: first time I browsed the CachedClient web, I overlooked the fact that effort was already made to implement the merge/revert feature. > Cheers, > b. Regards, -- hondza | GPG key: http://www.hondza.adslink.cz/key.asc Fingerprint: 31E7 EF56 7280 5C89 75E9 FF9D 010E 175F 7823 CF38 GPG/PGP encrypted/signed emails are welcome. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
