Hi Thomas,
thomas62186218@aol.com wrote:
I am following your thread on this topic...have any solutions emerged? I
as well have seen miserably performance when snapshots are active.
I am sorry, at least I still don't know any solution
(except avoiding snapshots wherever performance matters )-:
Regards,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Daum <gator_ml@yahoo.de>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Sent: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 8:04 am
Subject: Re: write performance with active snapshot
Hi,
Larry Dickson wrote:
My guess is that you are getting the typical seek overhead. Have you
tried making a volume group out of two separate RAID arrays (driving
different spindles), and using lvdisplay --maps to make sure the
parent
volume is on one array, the snapshot(s) on the other?
That was my suspicion, too (although I could not imagine such an extreme
impact). Just for testing I added a single disk to the same volume group
and put the snapshot onto that disk - amazingly it made hardly any
difference (Actually, I'm almost glad about that, because the combination
of a 12-disk-array with a single disk would be under almost all other
aspects foolish).
One thing that does improve the performance a little (actually by 100%,
which in this case meens still pretty lousy 16 MB/sec) is to increase
the chunk size to 512kb. (I don't know yet, how this might
affect
performance when dealing with many small files) ...
Regards,
Peter
On 11/9/08, *Peter Daum* <gator_ml@yahoo.de
<mailto:gator_ml@yahoo.de>>
wrote:
Hi,
for an application I am just working on it looks like lvm
snapshots
would
be just what I need as far as functionality is concerned.
Unfortunately,
I am experiencing such a massive degradation in performance, that
the
result is almost useless.
I'm working on a fairly fast machine (Quadcore, 8GB RAM) with a
big
hardware RAID array and lvm2 (Debian Lenny; Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64;
LVM version:2.02.39 (2008-06-27)
Library version: 1.02.27 (2008-06-25)
Driver version: 4.13.0)
Sequentially writing to a file (ext3) on a logical volume, I get
a
sustained performance of ~ 250 MB/sec. When I create a snapshot
volume, the write throughput drops to 7-8 MB/secs (on the
original
volume; writing to the snapshot I see a significant degradation,
but not nearly, as bad; read performance is o.k.).Is this
"normal"
or is there a
nything I can do to about it?
I looked in this list and searched the WWW but couldn't find any
concrete information on the performance impact of snapshots
(except http://www.nikhef.nl/~dennisvd/lvmcrap.html).
It seems like write performance should probably be less then 1/3
of the original throughput, because every write to the source
volume causes 3 I/O operations plus some overhead for meta data.
More difficult to estimate would be the time lost by additional
head movements. Still, a throughput degradation by a factor of 30
seems pretty extreme.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Peter Daum
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
Hi
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
