Dear Stuart and list,
I was thinking about snapshot and copy, but it looks like "less professional" than split a LV mirror.
I can explain: When I copy is difficult to say that I kept the same permissions and ownership; Different of a mirror, that the process really guarantee by itself that the data is still with the same characteristic.
Thank you all,
--
Lewis/Iceman/Levy
Google Talk! levy.santanna@gmail.com
ICQ 12913566
MSN levy.santanna@gmail.com
Meebo lewisgodus
I was thinking about snapshot and copy, but it looks like "less professional" than split a LV mirror.
I can explain: When I copy is difficult to say that I kept the same permissions and ownership; Different of a mirror, that the process really guarantee by itself that the data is still with the same characteristic.
Thank you all,
--
Lewis/Iceman/Levy
Google Talk! levy.santanna@gmail.com
ICQ 12913566
MSN levy.santanna@gmail.com
Meebo lewisgodus
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Levy Abinajm Melero Sant'Anna wrote:Why not take a snapshot, and copy that to an LV on new VG ?
> > I have one LV with some critical data, and want to make a safe copy with
> > less time possible of downtime. Could I make one mirror on a new PV
> > (lvconvert -m1) and split this copy into a new LV or/and maybe split the VG
> > into a new VG?
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
_______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
