Re: Removing PVs from Volume Groups which have allocated LVs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,
 
I ran onto a similar problem when trying to create a LV where the ramdisk PV came FIRST. It wouldn't do it even though I ordered it first in the list. So what I had to do was create a VG out of the first PV alone, and the LV on it, and then keep adding PV to VG and extend the LV. That resulted in a determinate ordering.
 
If the composite VG already exists, the only technique I know is to search or even write characteristic data patterns in the LV and also in all the PVs, thus determining offsets :-(
 
Larry Dickson
Cutting Edge Networked Storage
 
On 5/22/08, R Ramkumar <rramkumar@novell.com> wrote:

Hi,

I have a LVM setup where I have a VG with 3 PVs.. I have created 2 LVs from the VG which eventually has taken physical storage space from one or two of the PVs.. Now, when I want to shrink the VG, I need to know the unallocated PV so that I can remove from the VG..

Is there anyway that I can find out which PV is unallocated and which PV to remove from the VG.. Please let me know your views..

Thanks,
Ram


_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux