Re: Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bryn,
 
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
 
I'm glad to see this is not an issue. 
 
As for "dev253," if I only have three physical devices, why four dm entries?
 
Thanks again.

----- Original Message ----
From: Bryn M. Reeves <breeves@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:28:35 AM
Subject: Re: Disk /dev/dm-0 doesn't contain a valid partition table

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sean McGlynn wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> I did an fdisk -l to review my partition table (see results below), and
> found four entries that end with "Disk /dev/dm-X doesn't contain a valid
> partition table."  I don't recall seeing this in the past, so I believe
> it is something new.

Later kernels include dm devices in the list of partitions in proc, so
fdisk will attempt to scan them for partition tables. It's not harmful,
just noise.

> I recently began using kernel 2.6.21.1, up from 2.6.9-42.  I don't know
> if perhaps this had some effect, or if the entries are normal and I just
> never noticed them.

If you don't like it & you've not configured anything to use /dev/dm-*
devices directly (instead of /dev/mapper/* or /dev/<volgroup>/* or
whatever) then you can reconfigure udev to not create the dm-* nodes.

- From memory, you need to comment out the rule that begins
"KERNEL="dm-[0-9]*" in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules, or, for newer
udevs you can add ignore_device:

KERNEL=="dm-[0-9]*", ACTION="" OPTIONS+="ignore_device"

>  
>
> What led me here is that sar -d output includes four entries for hard
> drives (dev253 entries) when there are only three on my system.  Fdisk
> is reporting four DM devices, so I'm thinking there is some correlation,
> but I don't know what.

Those "dev253" entries are your device-mapper devices. Take a look at
/dev/dm-* with ls -l and you will see that the major number is 253.

Kind regards,
Bryn.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGUayT6YSQoMYUY94RAqJKAJ9dFJtaRg3fONo7kLOkDezcS/FizwCcDwFj
2McvW5Wl+zudmUZDO2aE1fQ=
=NHOE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut.
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux