On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:19, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:14:13AM +0200, Jens Wilke wrote: > > What is the reason for this? > > No code to do this has yet been written. > There should be no fundamental problems with doing it. pvmove does alreay something usefull if the skip on the mirror image is removed. Problem is, that this is not fool proof because the allocation contraints for a mirror need to be checked to maintain redundance. Looking on the allocator and looking on lvconvert, I think, doing it right will be a very ambitious task, or is my thinking wrong? Does it make sense to support "simple cases" of moving mirror images for the case that we have a source and a target specified and the target is empty or does not contain other images of the same mirror? On the other hand it is also possible to do a lvconvert -m0; pvmove; lvconvert -m1 Best, Jens _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/