Re: Performance impact of LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark H. Wood wrote:
However this effect is probably down in the noise for most systems. The only way to know if it's a problem for you is to measure. I would expect that, given contemporary amounts of caching on the drive, the controller, and in the OS, you probably won't see it unless you are driving your storage *really* hard. If you do, dump/recreate contiguously/restore will make it go away.

For database partitions we always use "lvcreate -C y" when creating LVs for this reason, for every other area of the system however, I haven't noticed almost any impact of LVM(1 or 2) except that striping is easier to set up than using RAID0 because there's no need to repartition.

For example, I often do something like:

lvcreate -C y -n dbdata1 -L 100G mainstore
lvcreate -I 2 -n dbtemp -L 10G mainstore


_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux