Re: LVM is low

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why dont you create a 'regular' reiserfs partition on the same server and re-try your transfer.

Comparing to another server isnt really fair; too many other factors: OS level, Network, Config, Server Load, Hardware, Disks, etc.

Scp isn't a good gauge of disk performance, as its bottlenecks are network and CPU (decryption). Why not try 'bonnie', a disk benchmarker.



Could you try explaining "really low" some more?
I copy lots of files with scp, from an old server to this new one with LVM. The system is unsuable during the copy, but not with a server with standards partitions...


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan W. Jurgensen - Berbee Information Networks - jurgensen@berbee.com

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux